Re: IPV6 possible recursive locking

2006-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hmm I remember fixing sk_clone before.. or was that skb_clone, I'd have ot > check. > Anyway I'll check this out either later today or tomorrow in more detail > and will send a patch. I vaguely recall you fixing it too. I just couldn't find anythi

Re: IPV6 possible recursive locking

2006-08-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Herbert Xu wrote: [] sk_clone+0xd4/0x350 [] inet_csk_clone+0x11/0x70 [] tcp_create_openreq_child+0x24/0x480 [] tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock+0x2c2/0x6f0 [] tcp_check_req+0x229/0x3a0 [] tcp_v6_do_rcv+0x17d/0x400 [] tcp_v6_rcv+0x7e5/0x850 Yes this is a known problem. The lock validator needs to le

Re: IPV6 possible recursive locking

2006-08-04 Thread Herbert Xu
Petr Vandrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > java_vm/7892 is trying to acquire lock: > (slock-AF_INET6){-+..}, at: [] sk_clone+0xd4/0x350 > > but task is already holding lock: > (slock-AF_INET6){-+..}, at: [] tcp_v6_rcv+0x323/0x850 > > other info that might help us debug this: > 1 lock held by

IPV6 possible recursive locking

2006-08-04 Thread Petr Vandrovec
Hello, I'm not sure whether this was reported already, but just in case... Box has only link scope IPv6 addresses assigned. java_vm was running some webex conferencing applet. Thanks, Petr