Gidday,
Thanks for this patch. I have a few questions:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The man page was supposed to document the kernel, so it's probably
> > a bug in the manpage. You should send a patch to the manpages
> > maintainers, with a warning in NOTES that the Linux behaviour
> > differs from
Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> > -.I IP_RECVTTL
> > +.I IP_TTL
>
> So is it the case that this option was just wrongly named in the
> original page, or is the change here reflective of something that
> has changed in the kernel? (It doesn't look like the latter is
> true, but I thought it better to
> > > control message with the time to live
> > > field of the received packet as a byte. Not supported for
> > > .B SOCK_STREAM
> > > @@ -789,6 +789,20 @@ received datagrams. Linux has the more g
> > > .I IP_PKTINFO
> > > for the same task.
> > > .PP
> > > +Some BSD sockets implementations a
