On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2017 03:11 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> Hi Adam,
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 30 August 2017 11:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> I wonder if U-Boot isn't pushing something to Li
On Thursday 07 September 2017 03:11 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>> On Wednesday 30 August 2017 11:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
I wonder if U-Boot isn't pushing something to Linux because it doesn't
appear to be running some of th
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wednesday 30 August 2017 11:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> I wonder if U-Boot isn't pushing something to Linux because it doesn't
>>> appear to be running some of the da850 specific code even when I run
>>> linux-next. Can you t
Hi Adam,
On Wednesday 30 August 2017 11:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> I wonder if U-Boot isn't pushing something to Linux because it doesn't
>> appear to be running some of the da850 specific code even when I run
>> linux-next. Can you tell me what verision of U-Boot you're using?
>> Other than us
On Wednesday 30 August 2017 06:19 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 05:32 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 2
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 05:32 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:53 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 05:32 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:53 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 29
On Tuesday 29 August 2017 05:32 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:53 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Tuesday 29 August 2017 02:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Adam For
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:53 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 02:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Adam Ford [170828 13:33]:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, G
On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:53 PM, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 02:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Adam Ford [170828 13:33]:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> Cc: Sekhar
>
>
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 02:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Adam Ford [170828 13:33]:
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko
>>> wrote:
Cc: Sekhar
On 08/28/2017 10:32 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>
> The davin
On Tuesday 29 August 2017 02:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Adam Ford [170828 13:33]:
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko
>> wrote:
>>> Cc: Sekhar
>>>
>>> On 08/28/2017 10:32 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
The davinvi_emac MAC address seems to attempt a call to
ti_cm_get_m
* Adam Ford [170828 13:33]:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> wrote:
> > Cc: Sekhar
> >
> > On 08/28/2017 10:32 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
> >>
> >> The davinvi_emac MAC address seems to attempt a call to
> >> ti_cm_get_macid in cpsw-common.c but it returns the message
> >> 'davinc
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> Cc: Sekhar
>
> On 08/28/2017 10:32 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
>>
>> The davinvi_emac MAC address seems to attempt a call to
>> ti_cm_get_macid in cpsw-common.c but it returns the message
>> 'davinci_emac davinci_emac.1: incompatible machine/dev
Cc: Sekhar
On 08/28/2017 10:32 AM, Adam Ford wrote:
The davinvi_emac MAC address seems to attempt a call to
ti_cm_get_macid in cpsw-common.c but it returns the message
'davinci_emac davinci_emac.1: incompatible machine/device type for
reading mac address ' and then generates a random MAC address
The davinvi_emac MAC address seems to attempt a call to
ti_cm_get_macid in cpsw-common.c but it returns the message
'davinci_emac davinci_emac.1: incompatible machine/device type for
reading mac address ' and then generates a random MAC address.
The function appears to lookup varions boards using
16 matches
Mail list logo