Re: DECnet routing rule resolution

2007-03-29 Thread Thomas Graf
* David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-03-29 11:43 > From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:24:10 +0100 > > > One of the effects of the recent tidy up of the DECnet routing rules > > code is that we are no longer able to see the difference between reading > > a ru

Re: DECnet routing rule resolution

2007-03-29 Thread David Miller
From: Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:24:10 +0100 > One of the effects of the recent tidy up of the DECnet routing rules > code is that we are no longer able to see the difference between reading > a rule of type FR_ACT_UNREACHABLE returning -ENETUNREACH and simply

DECnet routing rule resolution

2007-03-29 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, One of the effects of the recent tidy up of the DECnet routing rules code is that we are no longer able to see the difference between reading a rule of type FR_ACT_UNREACHABLE returning -ENETUNREACH and simply running out of rules to look at, which also returns the same thing. The DECnet code