On Wed 24 Jun 2020 at 15:22, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> On Wed 24 Jun 2020 at 13:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>> Hi Pablo,
>>>
>>> I've encountered a new issue with indirect offloads infrastructure. The
>>> issue is that on driver offl
On Wed 24 Jun 2020 at 13:30, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> I've encountered a new issue with indirect offloads infrastructure. The
>> issue is that on driver offload its indirect callbacks are not removed
>> from blocks
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 01:22:29PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> I've encountered a new issue with indirect offloads infrastructure. The
> issue is that on driver offload its indirect callbacks are not removed
> from blocks and any following offloads operations on block that has such
>
Hi Pablo,
I've encountered a new issue with indirect offloads infrastructure. The
issue is that on driver offload its indirect callbacks are not removed
from blocks and any following offloads operations on block that has such
callback in its offloads cb list causes call to unmapped address.
Steps
