On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:20:56AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 8/9/2018 10:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> The PCIe core will look in the device tree and when it creates the
> >>> platform device for the i210 on the pcie bus, it points
> >>> pdev->dev.of_node at this node. So long as you are us
On 8/9/2018 10:25 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> The PCIe core will look in the device tree and when it creates the
>>> platform device for the i210 on the pcie bus, it points
>>> pdev->dev.of_node at this node. So long as you are using a platform
>>> with DT, you can do this. I hope you are not using
> > The PCIe core will look in the device tree and when it creates the
> > platform device for the i210 on the pcie bus, it points
> > pdev->dev.of_node at this node. So long as you are using a platform
> > with DT, you can do this. I hope you are not using x86..
>
> Yes I am :( Any possible solut
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your answer :)
On 09-08-2018 16:03, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:54:11PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm preparing to add support for 10G in stmmac and I noticed that
>> Generic 10G PHY needs C45 support. Digging through the
>> registration c
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:54:11PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm preparing to add support for 10G in stmmac and I noticed that
> Generic 10G PHY needs C45 support. Digging through the
> registration callbacks for phy that are used in stmmac I reached
> to mdiobus_scan() and the follow
Hi All,
I'm preparing to add support for 10G in stmmac and I noticed that
Generic 10G PHY needs C45 support. Digging through the
registration callbacks for phy that are used in stmmac I reached
to mdiobus_scan() and the following call:
phydev = get_phy_device(bus, addr, false);
The last paramete
