Re: ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 02 May 2007 17:45:05 -0600 Topher Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Friesen wrote: > > Vlad Yasevich wrote: > > > >> If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple >

Re: ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Topher Fischer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Friesen wrote: > Vlad Yasevich wrote: > >> If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple >> sources and >> trusting all of them, then I haven't seen anything. >> >> I don't know t

Re: ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Chris Friesen wrote: > Vlad Yasevich wrote: > >> If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple >> sources and >> trusting all of them, then I haven't seen anything. >> >> I don't know the history as to why nothing has has been done.

Re: ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Chris Friesen
Vlad Yasevich wrote: If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple sources and trusting all of them, then I haven't seen anything. I don't know the history as to why nothing has has been done. This concept is a valuable tool to allow for fast publishing of I

Re: ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Vlad Yasevich
Topher Fischer wrote: > Does the kernel have any protection against ARP spoofing? If not, does > anybody know why not? (As in, nobody has done anything, or because of A, > B, and C). > > Thanks, > If by arp spoofing you mean receiving arp replies from multiple sources and tr

ARP Spoofing

2007-05-02 Thread Topher Fischer
Does the kernel have any protection against ARP spoofing? If not, does anybody know why not? (As in, nobody has done anything, or because of A, B, and C). Thanks, -- Topher Fischer GnuPG Fingerprint: 3597 1B8D C7A5 C5AF 2E19 EFF5 2FC3 BE99 D123 6674 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http