At 01:15 15/09/2006, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:51:50 +0100
Tony Jeffree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve/Brian -
>
> You've probably seen Mick Seaman's comments on this by now - as he points
> out in his email, tinkering with existing STP implementations is not
likely
>
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:51:50 +0100
Tony Jeffree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve/Brian -
>
> You've probably seen Mick Seaman's comments on this by now - as he points
> out in his email, tinkering with existing STP implementations is not likely
> to be a rewarding exercise and I would encoura
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 05:51:50PM +0100, Tony Jeffree wrote:
> Steve/Brian -
>
> You've probably seen Mick Seaman's comments on this by now - as he points
> out in his email, tinkering with existing STP implementations is not likely
> to be a rewarding exercise and I would encourage you not to
Steve/Brian -
You've probably seen Mick Seaman's comments on this by now - as he points
out in his email, tinkering with existing STP implementations is not likely
to be a rewarding exercise and I would encourage you not to go there.
I would suggest that it would be a much more valuable exerc
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:58:49 -0700
Brian Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi stephen and tony,
>
> i have been in contact with both of you and i figured it would make
> sense to get you to in contact on this issue, so here's the story:
>
> stephen is the maintainer of the linux spanning
