On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:11:01 +0200
bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:32:14AM +0900, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > By building all the possiblities into the kernel, ie. not as modules
> > you get the last one registered. TCP LP is probably the worst one
> > to us
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 08:32:14AM +0900, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> By building all the possiblities into the kernel, ie. not as modules
> you get the last one registered. TCP LP is probably the worst one
> to use, because it is designed for bulk low priority applications.
> It also is one of the
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:19:48 +0200
bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bad news is that I haven't yet been able to capture traces.
> Once every three days or so I get a crash of 2.6.18-rc[67] which
> *probably* end in tcp_ack(), but I don't have the exact dump.
>
> My .config is indeed
The bad news is that I haven't yet been able to capture traces.
Once every three days or so I get a crash of 2.6.18-rc[67] which
*probably* end in tcp_ack(), but I don't have the exact dump.
My .config is indeed heavy on TCP congestion stuff:
$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i tcp
CONFIG_INET_TCP_
