Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Alan Cox
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 13:27 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones: > surely no-one made an acpi aware vlb machine :) > > There are probably other creative ways. And the not-so-creative simple one which is how old IDE addresses much of this: Date: Fri Jun 30 16:39:20 2006 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 13/20]

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 11:54 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven: > > another quick hack is to check for vesa lb... eg if pci is present, skip > > this thing entirely :) > > Not really, many people made VLB/PCI combo boards. - check

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Alan Cox
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 11:54 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven: > another quick hack is to check for vesa lb... eg if pci is present, skip > this thing entirely :) Not really, many people made VLB/PCI combo boards. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:02AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:07 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Not especially. Perhaps the best thing to do here would be to make qdi > > compiled into the kernel (as opposed to modular) only do so if > > "probe_qdi=1" or similar is s

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 01:05 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar: > > it does things like: > > > > static const unsigned long qd_port[2] = { 0x30, 0xB0 }; > > static const unsigned long ide_port[2] = { 0x170, 0x1F0 }; > > > > [...] > >

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 11:07 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 01:05 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar: > > it does things like: > > > > static const unsigned long qd_port[2] = { 0x30, 0xB0 }; > > static const unsigned long ide_port[2] = { 0x170, 0x1F0 }; > > > >

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-30 Thread Alan Cox
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 01:05 +0200, ysgrifennodd Ingo Molnar: > it does things like: > > static const unsigned long qd_port[2] = { 0x30, 0xB0 }; > static const unsigned long ide_port[2] = { 0x170, 0x1F0 }; > > [...] > unsigned long port = qd_port[i]; >

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm too hunting use-after-free bugs - the ones fixed below fix certain > crashes, but i'm still seeing a nasty one. > > the crash is independent on lockdep enabled or disabled. See: > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/ > > for the config and the cras

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 29/06/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] OK. Perhaps try setting 8k stacks? Disable lockdep? I don't see that now. I will try to reproduce this with a previous config + Ingo's "Ignore loglevel on printks" patch. Regards, Michal -- Michal K. K. Piotrowski LTG - Linux Tes

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > This looks very strange. > > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07 > > Looks like a use after free. i'm too hunting use-after-free bugs -

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Andrew Morton
"Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 29/06/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > This looks very strange. > > > > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07 > >

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 29/06/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 29/06/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > This looks very strange. > > > > > > BUG

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 29/06/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > This looks very strange. > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07 Looks like a use after free. > printing eip: > c0138594 > *pde=

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > This looks very strange. > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07 Looks like a use after free. > printing eip: > c0138594 > *pde= > Oops: 0002 [#1] > 4K_STACK PREEMPT SMP > l

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi, On 29/06/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm4/ This looks very strange. BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07 printing eip: c0138594 *pde= Oops: 00

Re: 2.6.17-mm4

2006-06-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > On 29/06/06, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > > > This looks very strange. > > > > > > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual a