Re: 2.6.17-mm3

Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It was moved, sorry. I fail to spot any relevant backtraces for skge or indeed any part of the networking stack. Ingo/Arjan, perhaps you guys can figure out what's wrong here. In future perhaps you should consider posting the dmesg to the list di

Re: 2.6.17-mm3

Stephen Hemminger napisał(a): > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:12:42 +0200 > "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 27/06/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm

Re: 2.6.17-mm3

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:12:42 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 27/06/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.

Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > inet_bind() >> > ->sk_dst_get >> > ->read_lock(&sk->sk_dst_lock) We are still holding the sock lock when doing sk_dst_get. >> > > 1 lock held by java_vm/4418: >> > > #0: (af_family_keys + (sk)->sk_family#4){-+..}, at: [] >> > > tcp_v

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:42:34 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 > > "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] > > > > >

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.

On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 > "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] > > > > This is claiming that we're taking sk->sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner. > > > illega

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] > This is claiming that we're taking sk->sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner. > illegal {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage. It found someone doing write_lo

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 / EIP is at prism2_registers_proc_read+0x22/0x2ff [hostap_cs]

"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > address 0020 > printing eip: > f8d21f6e > *pde = > Oops: [#1] > 4K_STACKS PREEMPT > last sysfs file: /devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed > Modules linked i

Re: 2.6.17-mm3

Hi, On 27/06/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm3/ It looks like a skge bug = [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency de