On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 10:30:56PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> David, may I presume there will be a "take4"?
yes, refreshing is in progress.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:28:03PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:17:02PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > That is how I originally had the patch, but then had a question about
> > increasing structure size so I dropped flags to u16 or u8 for
> > structures that were made larg
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 12:17:02PM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> That is how I originally had the patch, but then had a question about
> increasing structure size so I dropped flags to u16 or u8 for
> structures that were made larger by the bitfield removal.
On non-x86 platforms, u16 and u8 generat
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:01:29PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:42:44AM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> > Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
> > difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
> > removes all bitfields from includ
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:42:44AM -0700, David Kimdon wrote:
> Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
> difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
> removes all bitfields from include/net/d80211.h.
>
> I converted the 1 bit bitfields into a bit in a
Continue d80211 bitfield removal. In general, compilers have
difficulty generating efficient code for bitfields. This patchset
removes all bitfields from include/net/d80211.h.
I converted the 1 bit bitfields into a bit in a u32/u16 or u8 flags
structure member. Larger bitfields I converted into
