On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:58:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > > > kmalloc is really slow actually - it always shows somewhere on top
> > > > in profiles and brings noticeble overhead
> > >
> > > It shouldn't. Please describe the workload and send the profiles.
> >
> >
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:20:24 -0700
>
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:48:15 +0400
> > Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > kmalloc is really slow actually -
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:20:24 -0700
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:48:15 +0400
> Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > kmalloc is really slow actually - it always shows somewhere on top
> > in profiles and brings noticeble overhead
>
> It shouldn'
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:32:38 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:48:15 +0400
> > Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > kmalloc is really slow actually -
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:48:15 +0400
> Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > kmalloc is really slow actually - it always shows somewhere on top
> > in profiles and brings noticeble overhead
>
> It sho
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:48:15 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kmalloc is really slow actually - it always shows somewhere on top
> in profiles and brings noticeble overhead
It shouldn't. Please describe the workload and send the profiles.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:03:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> One question on the implementation of kevent_user_ctl_modify/
> kevent_user_ctl_remove/kevent_user_ctl_add: What benchmarks did you
> do to add the separate 'fastpath' with the single onstack ukevent
> struct
One question on the implementation of kevent_user_ctl_modify/
kevent_user_ctl_remove/kevent_user_ctl_add: What benchmarks did you
do to add the separate 'fastpath' with the single onstack ukevent
structure if there are three or less events? I can't believe this
actually helps in practice for vari
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 05:27:53PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> One can find it in archive on homepage
> http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/old/?section=projects&item=kevent
> or attached.
Now it is really attached.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
#include
#include
#include
Again Evgeniy I really begin to like kevent :)
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 13:24, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
+struct kevent
+{
+ /* Used for kevent freeing.*/
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
+ struct ukevent event;
+ /* This lock protects ukevent manipulations, e.
Core files.
This patch includes core kevent files:
- userspace controlling
- kernelspace interfaces
- initialization
- notification state machines
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S b/arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S
index dd63d
11 matches
Mail list logo