Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:37:21PM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> +static inline int
>> +tcf_exts_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts,
>> + struct tcf_result *res)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
>> + if (
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> +static inline int
> +tcf_exts_exec(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tcf_exts *exts,
> + struct tcf_result *res)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> + if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))
> + return tcf_action_exec(skb, ext
Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:09:22PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>On 17-07-31 02:36 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:48:24PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>> > I am probably missing something. All those changes to just
>> > replace "if (exts->nr_actions)" with "if (tcf_exts_has_actio
On 17-07-31 02:36 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:48:24PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
I am probably missing something. All those changes to just
replace "if (exts->nr_actions)" with "if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))" ?
That is what the description says :)
I meant I wouldve e
Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 09:48:24PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote:
>I am probably missing something. All those changes to just
>replace "if (exts->nr_actions)" with "if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))" ?
That is what the description says :)
>
>cheers,
>jamal
>
>On 17-07-28 10:40 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
I am probably missing something. All those changes to just
replace "if (exts->nr_actions)" with "if (tcf_exts_has_actions(exts))" ?
cheers,
jamal
On 17-07-28 10:40 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
From: Jiri Pirko
Use the tcf_exts_has_actions helper instead or directly testing
exts->nr_actions in tcf_ex
From: Jiri Pirko
Use the tcf_exts_has_actions helper instead or directly testing
exts->nr_actions in tcf_exts_exec.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko
---
include/net/pkt_cls.h | 46 +++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/n
