RE: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-25 Thread David Laight
From: Alexei Starovoitov > Sent: 22 January 2017 22:51 > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > > could wrap. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. > > Acke

Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-24 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key

Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-24 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:44:34PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> > max_key is

Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-23 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift >> > could wrap. >>

Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-23 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Em Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 02:51:25PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > > could wrap. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > Looks fine. I think 'net-next'

Re: [patch] samples/bpf: silence shift wrapping warning

2017-01-22 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 07:51:43AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > max_key is a value in the 0-63 range, so on 32 bit systems the shift > could wrap. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Looks fine. I think 'net-next' is ok. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov > diff --git a/samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.