Hi Alex,
Alexander Duyck writes:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:57 PM Vinicius Costa Gomes
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Jeff Kirsher writes:
>>
>> > I will discuss the issue with my fellow developers and hopefully we can
>> > come up with a kernel interface that all drivers can use to handle thi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:57 PM Vinicius Costa Gomes
wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Jeff Kirsher writes:
>
> > I will discuss the issue with my fellow developers and hopefully we can
> > come up with a kernel interface that all drivers can use to handle this
> > issue.
>
> Did you have the chance to dis
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Kirsher writes:
> I will discuss the issue with my fellow developers and hopefully we can
> come up with a kernel interface that all drivers can use to handle this
> issue.
Did you have the chance to discuss this issue?
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Kirsher writes:
> A module parameter maybe fine for our out-of-tree driver, but not for the
> kernel driver.
>
> NACK on the basis that a new module parameter is being introduced for the
> driver. This is not acceptable by Dave Miller or myself. As of now, I do
> not have a alter
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 14:56 -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> We have seen some reports[1] of users complaining that they aren't
> able to use some queues when their machines have less than 4 cpus.
> This affects some TSN workloads, as different traffic classes are
> assigned different queues. T
We have seen some reports[1] of users complaining that they aren't
able to use some queues when their machines have less than 4 cpus.
This affects some TSN workloads, as different traffic classes are
assigned different queues. The current behavior limits the number of
traffic classes that can be re
