From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:08:06 -0700
> It was reported that update_suffix was taking a long time on systems where
> a large number of leaves were attached to a single node. As it turns out
> fib_table_flush was calling update_suffix for each leaf that didn't have all
> of
On 7/27/15 2:08 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
It was reported that update_suffix was taking a long time on systems where
a large number of leaves were attached to a single node. As it turns out
fib_table_flush was calling update_suffix for each leaf that didn't have all
of the aliases stripped from
It was reported that update_suffix was taking a long time on systems where
a large number of leaves were attached to a single node. As it turns out
fib_table_flush was calling update_suffix for each leaf that didn't have all
of the aliases stripped from it. As a result, on this large node removin
