On 16-02-29 01:25 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:40:53PM CET, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On 16-02-27 08:28 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> On 16-02-26 09:39
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:40:53PM CET, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 16-02-27 08:28 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend
>>> wrote:
On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016
Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 07:40:53PM CET, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 16-02-27 08:28 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend
>> wrote:
>>> On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> diff --git a/
On 16-02-27 08:28 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend
> wrote:
>> On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend
>>> wrote:
diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
index 2121df5..e64d20b 10
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:24 PM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend
>> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
>>> index 2121df5..e64d20b 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
>>> +++ b/i
On 16-02-26 09:39 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend
> wrote:
>> The offload decision was originally very basic and tied to if the dev
>> implemented the appropriate ndo op hook. The next step is to allow
>> the user to more flexibly define if any paticular rule
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, John Fastabend
wrote:
> The offload decision was originally very basic and tied to if the dev
> implemented the appropriate ndo op hook. The next step is to allow
> the user to more flexibly define if any paticular rule should be
> offloaded or not. In order to hav
Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:53:49PM CET, john.fastab...@gmail.com wrote:
>The offload decision was originally very basic and tied to if the dev
>implemented the appropriate ndo op hook. The next step is to allow
>the user to more flexibly define if any paticular rule should be
>offloaded or not. In ord
The offload decision was originally very basic and tied to if the dev
implemented the appropriate ndo op hook. The next step is to allow
the user to more flexibly define if any paticular rule should be
offloaded or not. In order to have this logic in one function lift
the current check into a helpe
