On 7/30/2020 5:39 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> LGTM,
>
> minor suggestions:
> - could you add opt-in support flags to struct devlink_ops, a'la
>ethtool_ops->supported_coalesce_params so that you don't have to
>modify all drivers to reject unsupported things?
Sure that makes sense.
>
LGTM,
minor suggestions:
- could you add opt-in support flags to struct devlink_ops, a'la
ethtool_ops->supported_coalesce_params so that you don't have to
modify all drivers to reject unsupported things?
- could you split patch 2 into an ice change and a devlink core
change?
This series introduces support for a new attribute to the flash update
command: DEVLINK_ATTR_FLASH_UPDATE_OVERWRITE_MASK. This attribute is a u32
value that represents a bitmask of which subsections of flash to
request/allow overwriting when performing a flash update.
The intent is to support the
