On 07/03/2018 07:40 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 06/30/2018 03:51 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
>> The current code, in the error path of sock_hash_ctx_update_elem,
>> checks if the sock has a psock in the user data and if so decrements
>> the reference count of the psock. However, if the error happ
On 06/30/2018 03:51 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
> The current code, in the error path of sock_hash_ctx_update_elem,
> checks if the sock has a psock in the user data and if so decrements
> the reference count of the psock. However, if the error happens early
> in the error path we may have never incr
The current code, in the error path of sock_hash_ctx_update_elem,
checks if the sock has a psock in the user data and if so decrements
the reference count of the psock. However, if the error happens early
in the error path we may have never incremented the psock reference
count and if the psock exi
