Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:36 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> Hi Sridhar:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
chunk header to be in the skb
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:36 -0500, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Hi Sridhar:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> >> I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
> >> chunk header to be in the skb head.
> >> But we do handl
Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi Sridhar:
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>> I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
>> chunk header to be in the skb head.
>> But we do handle skbs with data in the frag_list.
>> Not sure about skb's with paged
Hi Sridhar:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 05:31:24PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>
> I think we currently assume atleast the SCTP header and the data
> chunk header to be in the skb head.
> But we do handle skbs with data in the frag_list.
> Not sure about skb's with paged fragments.
You can't ass
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 23:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:11:28 +1100
>
> > [SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
> ...
> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'll
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:11:28 +1100
> [SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
...
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll apply this, thanks a lot.
> Sridhar, could you please organise an audit of SCTP to make sur
Hi Dave:
[SCTP]: Always linearise packet on input
I was looking at a RHEL5 bug report involving Xen and SCTP
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212550).
It turns out that SCTP wasn't written to handle skb fragments at
all. The absence of any calls to skb_may_pull is test
