Re: [RFT/RFC net-next 0/2] net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support

2017-12-15 Thread Egil Hjelmeland
Hi Den 15. des. 2017 01:28, skrev Florian Fainelli: Hi all, This patch series replaces the existing PHYLIB integration with PHYLINK which is a superior solution since we need to support a collection of fixed links, integrated PHYs, SFP, non-pluggable SFPs etc. I am expecting quite a lot of br

Re: [RFT/RFC net-next 0/2] net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support

2017-12-15 Thread Andrew Lunn
> 1. s/WARN_ON(!lockdep_rtnl_is_held())/ASSERT_RTNL()/ in phylink.c - >probably wouldn't have been noticed if it wasn't for the lockdep >splat with DSA's interrupt handling during boot that's been there >since -rc1. (Andrew mentioned that it's known, so I haven't >reported that.)

Re: [RFT/RFC net-next 0/2] net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support

2017-12-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:28:48PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch series replaces the existing PHYLIB integration with PHYLINK which > is a superior solution since we need to support a collection of fixed links, > integrated PHYs, SFP, non-pluggable SFPs etc. > > I am exp

[RFT/RFC net-next 0/2] net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support

2017-12-14 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi all, This patch series replaces the existing PHYLIB integration with PHYLINK which is a superior solution since we need to support a collection of fixed links, integrated PHYs, SFP, non-pluggable SFPs etc. I am expecting quite a lot of breakage, for a number of reasons: - PHYLINK does not cre