Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] net: phy: add CAN PHY Virtual Bus

2020-10-23 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Most of CAN PHYs (transceivers) are not attached to any data bus, so we > are not able to communicate with them. For this case, we introduce a CAN > specific virtual bus to make use of existing PHY framework. I don't think you are m

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/6] net: phy: add CAN PHY Virtual Bus

2020-10-23 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:56:21PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Most of CAN PHYs (transceivers) are not attached to any data bus, so we > are not able to communicate with them. For this case, we introduce a CAN > specific virtual bus to make use of existing PHY framework. > > Signed-off-by: Olek

[RFC PATCH v1 1/6] net: phy: add CAN PHY Virtual Bus

2020-10-23 Thread Oleksij Rempel
Most of CAN PHYs (transceivers) are not attached to any data bus, so we are not able to communicate with them. For this case, we introduce a CAN specific virtual bus to make use of existing PHY framework. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel --- drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 8 ++ drivers/net/phy/M