On 30/09/15 01:21, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
> the devm_ memory allocation calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
For this entire series, on BCM7445 (using bcm_sf2)
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli
Thanks!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe fro
On 30/09/15 14:34, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Neil Armstrong
> wrote:
>> To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
>> the devm_ memory allocation calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
>> ---
>> net/dsa/dsa.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 ins
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
> the devm_ memory allocation calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
> net/dsa/dsa.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/
Hi Neil
I tested all three patches on a board with three switches.
1) Normal boot
2) Bad address set for the 3rd switch so that it was not found, so
causing the probe to fail.
No regressions observed.
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn
As Florian said, this is going in the right direction for modular
To simplify and prevent memory leakage when unbinding, use
the devm_ memory allocation calls.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
---
net/dsa/dsa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa.c b/net/dsa/dsa.c
index c59fa5d..98f94c2 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa.c
