From: Shannon Nelson
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:56:06 -0700
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:03 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
>> index f002a2c5e33c..4fa951112873 100644
>> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
>> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
>> @@ -994,6 +994,15
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:03 AM, David Miller wrote:
>
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> index f002a2c5e33c..4fa951112873 100644
> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
> @@ -994,6 +994,15 @@ struct xfrm_dst {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
Perhaps the new xf
Only IPSEC routes have a non-NULL dst->child pointer. And IPSEC
routes are identified by a non-NULL dst->xfrm pointer.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 9 +
net/ipv4/xfrm4_mode_tunnel.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/xfrm6_mode_tunnel.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/xfrm6_poli
