On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:25:14PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 18:40 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > Only two of dev_ioctl() callers may pass SIOCGIFCONF to it.
> > Separating that codepath from the rest of dev_ioctl() allows both
> > to simplify dev_ioctl() itself (all oth
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 18:40 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Only two of dev_ioctl() callers may pass SIOCGIFCONF to it.
> Separating that codepath from the rest of dev_ioctl() allows both
> to simplify dev_ioctl() itself (all other cases work with struct
> ifreq *)
> *and* seriously simplify the com
[
This is just an RFC - I'm not asking to apply it at the moment. Are there
any objections in principle to that change?
]
Only two of dev_ioctl() callers may pass SIOCGIFCONF to it.
Separating that codepath from the rest of dev_ioctl() allows both
to simplify dev_ioctl() itself (all other
