From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:33:47 -0700
> I split them into two patches: 1 is the SCTP stuff, 2 is the range stuff.
> Retesting tonight.
Thank you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:24:20 -0400
>
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c 2007-10-10 08:27:00.0 -0700
> > > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c 2007-
From: Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:24:20 -0400
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c2007-10-10 08:27:00.0 -0700
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c2007-10-10 09:44:35.0 -0700
> > @@ -147,13 +147,13 @@ int __udp_lib_get_port(struct soc
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
int inet_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk,
const struct inet_bind_bucket *tb)
@@ -77,10 +90,11 @@ int inet_csk_get_port(struct inet_hashin
local_bh_disable();
if (!snum) {
- int low = sysctl_local_port_range[0]
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> More complete version of local port range checking.
>
> 1. Enforce that low < high when setting.
> 2. Use seqlock to ensure atomic update.
> 3. Add port randomization to SCTP. This is a new feature but
>easier than maintaining old code that was broken if range
>c
More complete version of local port range checking.
1. Enforce that low < high when setting.
2. Use seqlock to ensure atomic update.
3. Add port randomization to SCTP. This is a new feature but
easier than maintaining old code that was broken if range
changed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemming
