Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-24 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi Florian, On 07-04-2018 20:58, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 04/06/2018 06:51 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: >> Hi Florian, >> >> On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: Hi All, I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support f

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-07 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 04/06/2018 06:51 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for >>> driver private ioctl's in ethtool. >>> >>> Background: S

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-06 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi Andrew, On 06-04-2018 15:47, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:51:15PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote: >> Hi Florian, >> >> On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: Hi All, I would like to know your opinion regarding adding

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-06 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:51:15PM +0100, Jose Abreu wrote: > Hi Florian, > > On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for > >> driver private ioctl's in ethtool.

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-06 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi Michal, On 06-04-2018 10:07, Michal Kubecek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:50:49AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: >>> Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of >>> features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two >

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-06 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi Florian, On 05-04-2018 16:50, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for >> driver private ioctl's in ethtool. >> >> Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of >> features

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-06 Thread Michal Kubecek
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:50:49AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: > > Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of > > features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two > > examples: One of the most recent one is the safety feat

Re: [RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-05 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 04/05/2018 03:47 AM, Jose Abreu wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for > driver private ioctl's in ethtool. > > Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of > features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two > examples:

[RFC] ethtool: Support for driver private ioctl's

2018-04-05 Thread Jose Abreu
Hi All, I would like to know your opinion regarding adding support for driver private ioctl's in ethtool. Background: Synopsys Ethernet IP's have a certain number of features which can be reconfigured at runtime. Giving you two examples: One of the most recent one is the safety features, which ca