From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:09:58 -0800
> Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name.
> If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't
> show up in /sys or /proc
>
> Compile tested only...
I have no objections to
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:26:47 +0100
Jiri Benc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:09:58 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name.
> > If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't
> > show up in /sys or
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:09:58 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name.
> If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't
> show up in /sys or /proc
What about things like neigh_sysctl_register which expects nonempty dev
na
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:09:58PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name.
> If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't
> show up in /sys or /proc
That sounds even better indeed!
Of course register_netdevice should
Change to allow register_netdevice() to be called with a blank name.
If name is blank, it is not put in name hash list, and doesn't
show up in /sys or /proc
Compile tested only...
---
net/core/dev.c | 56 +---
1 files changed, 33 insertions(+
