On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, TAKANO Ryousei wrote:
> From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, TAKANO Ryousei wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -1083,6 +1104,9 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct
> > > sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
> > > int fack_count;
> > >
Hi Ilpo,
Thanks for your reply.
Most of my response are in the reply to patch 1/2.
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] TCP: skip processing cached SACK blocks
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 13:37:21 +0300 (EEST)
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, TAKANO Ryousei
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, TAKANO Ryousei wrote:
> This patch allows to process only newly reported SACK blocks at the
> sender side. An ACK packet contains up to three SACK blocks, and some
"A SACK option that specifies n blocks will have a length of 8*n+2
bytes, so the 40 bytes available for TCP
This patch allows to process only newly reported SACK blocks at the
sender side. An ACK packet contains up to three SACK blocks, and some
of them may be already reported and processed blocks. This patch
prevents processing of such already processed SACK blocks.
Signed-off-by: Ryousei Takano <[EM
