On Wednesday 15 August 2007 02:40:35 John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:44:02AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > Ok, I'll give it a try, with small modifications.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Sunday 12 August 200
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:44:02AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Ok, I'll give it a try, with small modifications.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > On Sunday 12 August 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Additional changes in this patch:
> > > - small
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Ok, I'll give it a try, with small modifications.
Thanks.
> On Sunday 12 August 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Additional changes in this patch:
> > - small help text changes
> > - B44_PCI is no longer usr visible (automatically enab
Ok, I'll give it a try, with small modifications.
On Sunday 12 August 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Additional changes in this patch:
> - small help text changes
> - B44_PCI is no longer usr visible (automatically enabled when possible)
I think we want that to be selectable, as it's not needed
on so
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 04:42:39PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 11 August 2007 16:30:02 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > And offering more options than required or manually sending users into
> > other menus are bad thing for your users.
>
> Breaking compilations are as bad.
> So, does your e
