On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
>> So unless I'm mistaken I don't see any problem using "depends on
>> PTP_1588_CLOCK" here.
>
> Furthermore that wouldn't be a first. See for example
> PTP_1588_CLOCK_GIANFAR, PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> So unless I'm mistaken I don't see any problem using "depends on
> PTP_1588_CLOCK" here.
Furthermore that wouldn't be a first. See for example
PTP_1588_CLOCK_GIANFAR, PTP_1588_CLOCK_IXP46X, DP83640_PHY, etc.
Nicolas
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> With posix timers having become optional, we get a build error with
> >> the cpts time sync option of the CPSW driver:
> >>
> >> drivers/net/
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> With posix timers having become optional, we get a build error with
>> the cpts time sync option of the CPSW driver:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c: In function 'cpts_find_ts':
>> drivers/n
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With posix timers having become optional, we get a build error with
> the cpts time sync option of the CPSW driver:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c: In function 'cpts_find_ts':
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c:291:23: error: implicit declaration of
With posix timers having become optional, we get a build error with
the cpts time sync option of the CPSW driver:
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c: In function 'cpts_find_ts':
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c:291:23: error: implicit declaration of function
'ptp_classify_raw';did you mean 'ptp_classif
