On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> llcp_sock_getname() checks llcp_sock->dev to make sure
>> llcp_sock is already connected or bound, however, we could
>> be in the middle of llcp_sock_bind() where llcp_sock->dev
>> is bound
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> llcp_sock_getname() checks llcp_sock->dev to make sure
> llcp_sock is already connected or bound, however, we could
> be in the middle of llcp_sock_bind() where llcp_sock->dev
> is bound and llcp_sock->service_name_len is set,
> but llcp_sock->ser
llcp_sock_getname() checks llcp_sock->dev to make sure
llcp_sock is already connected or bound, however, we could
be in the middle of llcp_sock_bind() where llcp_sock->dev
is bound and llcp_sock->service_name_len is set,
but llcp_sock->service_name is not, in this case we would
lead to copy some by
