From: Cong Wang
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:58:34 -0700
> All the 3 callers of addrconf_add_mroute() assert RTNL
> lock, they don't take any additional lock either, so
> it is safe to convert it to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Same for sit_add_v4_addrs().
>
> Cc: David Ahern
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
Appl
On 8/22/18 1:58 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> All the 3 callers of addrconf_add_mroute() assert RTNL
> lock, they don't take any additional lock either, so
> it is safe to convert it to GFP_KERNEL.
>
> Same for sit_add_v4_addrs().
>
> Cc: David Ahern
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrco
All the 3 callers of addrconf_add_mroute() assert RTNL
lock, they don't take any additional lock either, so
it is safe to convert it to GFP_KERNEL.
Same for sit_add_v4_addrs().
Cc: David Ahern
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 delet
