On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 5:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Vetter
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10:45 +0200
>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Vetter
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 08:10, David Miller wrote:
> From
On Wed, 31 May 2017, David Miller wrote:
> And we can't understand why respinning with the requested change is
> less work than making several postings such as this one.
When our CI hits tons of non-drm issues every merge window, I imagine
our developers can start to get a little frustrated tryin
From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:10:45 +0200
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On 31 May 2017 at 08:10, David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:15:42 +0200
>>
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> On 31 May 2017 at 08:10, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Vetter
>>> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:15:42 +0200
>>>
If the e1000e maintainer wants to coalesce or not return stateme
