On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:43:16PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:39:30 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > Which part do you think is hackish here? Sending the layer 2 update
> > frame or moving it to kernel?
>
> The latter.
>
> Is it really needed to send it unconditionally for ea
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:39:30 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Which part do you think is hackish here? Sending the layer 2 update
> frame or moving it to kernel?
The latter.
Is it really needed to send it unconditionally for each added STA? And
cannot it be generated in userspace?
Thanks,
Jiri
-
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:50:41 +0200, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> Imagine an ESS consisting of several APs in a switched wired network. Client
> roams from one AP to another. In order to update the FDB of the switches, a
> packet with the client MAC address needs to be originated from the ethernet
> int
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:22:56PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:16:12 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> > Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev
> > that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev,
> > send another update frame. T
Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2006 19:22 schrieb Jiri Benc:
> > Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev
> > that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev,
> > send another update frame. This fixes an issue in which a local bridge
> > table was not up
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:16:12 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev
> that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev,
> send another update frame. This fixes an issue in which a local bridge
> table was not updated
On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:16:12 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev
> that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev,
> send another update frame. This fixes an issue in which a local bridge
> table was not updated
Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev
that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev,
send another update frame. This fixes an issue in which a local bridge
table was not updated when hostapd sent this frame.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <[EMA
