Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] task_isolation: vmstat: add quiet_vmstat_sync function

2020-11-23 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Alex, On Mon, Nov 23 2020 at 17:56, Alex Belits wrote: why are you insisting on adding 'task_isolation: ' as prefix to every single patch? That's wrong as I explained before. The prefix denotes the affected subsystem and 'task_isolation' is _NOT_ a subsystem. It's the project name you are using

[PATCH v5 1/9] task_isolation: vmstat: add quiet_vmstat_sync function

2020-11-23 Thread Alex Belits
From: Chris Metcalf In commit f01f17d3705b ("mm, vmstat: make quiet_vmstat lighter") the quiet_vmstat() function became asynchronous, in the sense that the vmstat work was still scheduled to run on the core when the function returned. For task isolation, we need a synchronous version of the func