Re: [PATCH v4.14-stable] sch_netem: restore skb->dev after dequeuing from the rbtree

2018-10-31 Thread Sasha Levin
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:12:51PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Greg, On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 03:43:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Christoph Paasch Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:38:40 -0700 > Upstream commit bffa72cf7f9d ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") got > backported as commit 6b921536f1

Re: [PATCH v4.14-stable] sch_netem: restore skb->dev after dequeuing from the rbtree

2018-10-30 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Greg, On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 03:43:48PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Christoph Paasch > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:38:40 -0700 > > > Upstream commit bffa72cf7f9d ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") got > > backported as commit 6b921536f170 ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") into the > > v4.14.x-tree.

Re: [PATCH v4.14-stable] sch_netem: restore skb->dev after dequeuing from the rbtree

2018-10-18 Thread David Miller
From: Christoph Paasch Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:38:40 -0700 > Upstream commit bffa72cf7f9d ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") got > backported as commit 6b921536f170 ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") into the > v4.14.x-tree. > > However, the backport does not include the changes in sch_netem.c > > We n

[PATCH v4.14-stable] sch_netem: restore skb->dev after dequeuing from the rbtree

2018-10-18 Thread Christoph Paasch
Upstream commit bffa72cf7f9d ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") got backported as commit 6b921536f170 ("net: sk_buff rbnode reorg") into the v4.14.x-tree. However, the backport does not include the changes in sch_netem.c We need these, as otherwise the skb->dev pointer is not set when dequeueing from