From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 07:25:34 -0600
> On 10/8/18 4:17 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>>> @@ -4696,13 +4697,32 @@ static int rtnl_stats_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>>
>>> cb->seq = net->dev_base_seq;
>>>
>>> - if (nlmsg_len(cb->nlh) < siz
On 10/8/18 4:17 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
>> @@ -4696,13 +4697,32 @@ static int rtnl_stats_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct netlink_callback *cb)
>>
>> cb->seq = net->dev_base_seq;
>>
>> -if (nlmsg_len(cb->nlh) < sizeof(*ifsm))
>> +if (nlmsg_len(cb->nlh) < sizeof(*ifsm)) {
>
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 08:16:32PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> From: David Ahern
>
> Update rtnl_stats_dump for strict data checking. If the flag is set,
> the dump request is expected to have an if_stats_msg struct as the header.
> All elements of the struct are expected to be 0 except filter_ma
From: David Ahern
Update rtnl_stats_dump for strict data checking. If the flag is set,
the dump request is expected to have an if_stats_msg struct as the header.
All elements of the struct are expected to be 0 except filter_mask which
must be non-0 (legacy behavior). No attributes are supported.
