From: Herbert Xu
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:03:24 +1100
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:47:58PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> I'll allow Herbert time to think about this some more as he requested
>> in comments against the first version of this series.
>
> Sorry for the late response. Tom's chan
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:47:58PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'll allow Herbert time to think about this some more as he requested
> in comments against the first version of this series.
Sorry for the late response. Tom's changes look good to me.
We should also fix up all existing rhashtabl
From: Tom Herbert
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:31:40 -0800
> This patch contains some changes to related rhashtable:
>
> - Above allow rhashtable_walk_start to return void
> - Add a functon to peek at the next entry during a walk
> - Abstract out function to compute a has for a table
> - A library
This patch contains some changes to related rhashtable:
- Above allow rhashtable_walk_start to return void
- Add a functon to peek at the next entry during a walk
- Abstract out function to compute a has for a table
- A library function to alloc a spinlocks bucket array
- Call the above function f
