From: Tobias Brunner
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:44:26 +0200
> Even if sending SCIs is explicitly disabled, the code that creates the
> Security Tag might still decide to add it (e.g. if multiple RX SCs are
> defined on the MACsec interface).
> But because the header length so far only depended on
2016-10-24, 15:44:26 +0200, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> Even if sending SCIs is explicitly disabled, the code that creates the
> Security Tag might still decide to add it (e.g. if multiple RX SCs are
> defined on the MACsec interface).
> But because the header length so far only depended on the configu
Even if sending SCIs is explicitly disabled, the code that creates the
Security Tag might still decide to add it (e.g. if multiple RX SCs are
defined on the MACsec interface).
But because the header length so far only depended on the configuration
option the SCI overwrote the original frame's conte
