On 6/29/16 9:07 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:50:55 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
Currently the syntax for VRF related commands is rather kludgy and
inconsistent from one subcommand to another. This set adds support
for the VRF keyword to the link, address, neigh, and route co
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:50:55 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
> Currently the syntax for VRF related commands is rather kludgy and
> inconsistent from one subcommand to another. This set adds support
> for the VRF keyword to the link, address, neigh, and route commands
> to improve the user experience li
Currently the syntax for VRF related commands is rather kludgy and
inconsistent from one subcommand to another. This set adds support
for the VRF keyword to the link, address, neigh, and route commands
to improve the user experience listing data associated with vrfs,
modifying routes or doing a rou
