On 07/02, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 05/29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > 0 is a valid FD, so it's better to initialize it to -1, as is done in
> > other places. Also, technically, BTF type ID 0 is valid (it's a VOID
> > type), so it's more reliable to check btf_fd, instead of
> > btf_key_type_id,
On 05/29, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> 0 is a valid FD, so it's better to initialize it to -1, as is done in
> other places. Also, technically, BTF type ID 0 is valid (it's a VOID
> type), so it's more reliable to check btf_fd, instead of
> btf_key_type_id, to determine if there is any BTF associated w
0 is a valid FD, so it's better to initialize it to -1, as is done in
other places. Also, technically, BTF type ID 0 is valid (it's a VOID
type), so it's more reliable to check btf_fd, instead of
btf_key_type_id, to determine if there is any BTF associated with a map.
Acked-by: Song Liu
Signed-of
