On 5/28/20 4:25 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> That said, you should use the new SEC(".maps") definitions, but you
> need to use some tricks to avoid a BTF-ID getting generated. Let me
> help you with something that should work:
>
> /* DEVMAP values */
> struct devmap_val {
> __u32 ifi
On 5/28/20 1:08 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index ..d81b2b366f39
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/pr
On Thu, 28 May 2020 00:08:34 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_with_devmap.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_with_devmap.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index ..815cd59b4866
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testi
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:15 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> Add tests to verify ability to add an XDP program to a
> entry in a DEVMAP.
>
> Add negative tests to show DEVMAP programs can not be
> attached to devices as a normal XDP program, and accesses
> to egress_ifindex require BPF_XDP_DEVMAP attach
Add tests to verify ability to add an XDP program to a
entry in a DEVMAP.
Add negative tests to show DEVMAP programs can not be
attached to devices as a normal XDP program, and accesses
to egress_ifindex require BPF_XDP_DEVMAP attach type.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern
---
.../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_d
