On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 4:44 PM Alan Maguire wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > __builtin_btf_type_id() is really only supported in llvm12
> > and 64bit return value support is pushed to llvm12 trunk
> > a while back. The builtin is introduced in llvm11 but has a
>
On 12/5/20 4:43 PM, Alan Maguire wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, Yonghong Song wrote:
__builtin_btf_type_id() is really only supported in llvm12
and 64bit return value support is pushed to llvm12 trunk
a while back. The builtin is introduced in llvm11 but has a
corner bug, so llvm12 is recomme
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> __builtin_btf_type_id() is really only supported in llvm12
> and 64bit return value support is pushed to llvm12 trunk
> a while back. The builtin is introduced in llvm11 but has a
> corner bug, so llvm12 is recommended. So if people use the builti
On 12/5/20 12:35 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 12/4/20 10:48 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
This series aims to add support to bpf_snprintf_btf() and
bpf_seq_printf_btf() allowing them to store string representations
of module-specific types, as well as the kernel-specific ones
they currently suppor
On 12/4/20 10:48 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
This series aims to add support to bpf_snprintf_btf() and
bpf_seq_printf_btf() allowing them to store string representations
of module-specific types, as well as the kernel-specific ones
they currently support.
Patch 1 removes the btf_module_mutex, as
This series aims to add support to bpf_snprintf_btf() and
bpf_seq_printf_btf() allowing them to store string representations
of module-specific types, as well as the kernel-specific ones
they currently support.
Patch 1 removes the btf_module_mutex, as since we will need to
look up module BTF durin
