From: David Miller
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:43:26 +0100 (WEST)
> This is an RFC patch series, based upon some discussions with
> various developers, that removes UFO offloading.
>
> Very few devices support this operation, it's usefullness is
> quesitonable at best, and it adds a non-trivial am
From: Michal Kubecek
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:45:31 +0200
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:43:26AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> This is an RFC patch series, based upon some discussions with
>> various developers, that removes UFO offloading.
>>
>> Very few devices support this operation, it's u
From: Michal Kubecek
> Sent: 07 July 2017 13:46
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:43:26AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > This is an RFC patch series, based upon some discussions with
> > various developers, that removes UFO offloading.
> >
> > Very few devices support this operation, it's usefullnes
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:43:26AM +0100, David Miller wrote:
>
> This is an RFC patch series, based upon some discussions with
> various developers, that removes UFO offloading.
>
> Very few devices support this operation, it's usefullness is
> quesitonable at best, and it adds a non-trivial amo
This is an RFC patch series, based upon some discussions with
various developers, that removes UFO offloading.
Very few devices support this operation, it's usefullness is
quesitonable at best, and it adds a non-trivial amount of
complexity to our data paths.
v2: Delete more code thanks to feedb
