On 9/7/20 12:24 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
[..]
> One comment on this. Looks like the above is the same in all
> commit messages. Please provide that generic information
> with the patch 0/n and remove it from the other patches.
Yeah, I think I've used to that from x86/core submissions - they pre
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:49:44AM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> XFRM is disabled for compatible users because of the UABI difference.
> The difference is in structures paddings and in the result the size
> of netlink messages differ.
>
> Possibility for compatible application to manage xfrm tunn
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on ipsec/master]
[also build test ERROR on kselftest/next linus/master v5.9-rc2 next-20200825]
[cannot apply to ipsec-next/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when
XFRM is disabled for compatible users because of the UABI difference.
The difference is in structures paddings and in the result the size
of netlink messages differ.
Possibility for compatible application to manage xfrm tunnels was
disabled by: the commmit 19d7df69fdb2 ("xfrm: Refuse to insert 32
