I think you meant to send these as [PATCH bpf-next] for bpf-next.
I guess we can do a round of reviews and update the next revision (if
any) with the correct prefixes.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:27 PM Florent Revest wrote:
>
> From: Florent Revest
>
> Currently, the sock_from_file prototype take
From: Florent Revest
Currently, the sock_from_file prototype takes an "err" pointer that is
either not set or set to -ENOTSOCK IFF the returned socket is NULL. This
makes the error redundant and it is ignored by a few callers.
This patch simplifies the API by letting callers deduce the error bas
