Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:18:45PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 10/12/2020 à 12:48, Eyal Birger a écrit :
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:10 PM Nicolas Dichtel
> > wrote:
> [snip]
> > I also think they should be consistent. But it'd still be confusing to me
> > to get an OUTPUT ho
Le 10/12/2020 à 12:48, Eyal Birger a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
Hi Eyal,
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:10 PM Nicolas Dichtel
> wrote:
[snip]
> I also think they should be consistent. But it'd still be confusing to me
> to get an OUTPUT hook on the inner packet in the forwarding case.
I re-read the wh
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:10 PM Nicolas Dichtel
wrote:
>
> Le 09/12/2020 à 15:40, Eyal Birger a écrit :
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Eyal,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:47:02PM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Dec 7
Le 09/12/2020 à 15:40, Eyal Birger a écrit :
> Hi Phil,
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
>>
>> Hi Eyal,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:47:02PM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> The packet appears twice being sent t
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> Hi Eyal,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:47:02PM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
> > >
> > > With an IPsec tunnel without dedicated interface, netfilter sees locally
> > > generated pack
Hi Eyal,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:47:02PM +0200, Eyal Birger wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
> >
> > With an IPsec tunnel without dedicated interface, netfilter sees locally
> > generated packets twice as they exit the physical interface: Once as "the
> > inner packet
Hi Phil,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 4:07 PM Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> With an IPsec tunnel without dedicated interface, netfilter sees locally
> generated packets twice as they exit the physical interface: Once as "the
> inner packet" with IPsec context attached and once as the encrypted
> (ESP) packet.
Le 08/12/2020 à 15:00, Phil Sutter a écrit :
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:02:16AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Le 07/12/2020 à 14:43, Phil Sutter a écrit :
> [...]
>>> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
>>> index aa4cdcf69d471..24af61c95b4d4 1006
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:02:16AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 07/12/2020 à 14:43, Phil Sutter a écrit :
[...]
> > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> > index aa4cdcf69d471..24af61c95b4d4 100644
> > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c
> > +++ b/net/x
Le 07/12/2020 à 14:43, Phil Sutter a écrit :
> With an IPsec tunnel without dedicated interface, netfilter sees locally
> generated packets twice as they exit the physical interface: Once as "the
> inner packet" with IPsec context attached and once as the encrypted
> (ESP) packet.
>
> With xfrm_in
With an IPsec tunnel without dedicated interface, netfilter sees locally
generated packets twice as they exit the physical interface: Once as "the
inner packet" with IPsec context attached and once as the encrypted
(ESP) packet.
With xfrm_interface, the inner packet did not traverse NF_INET_LOCAL_
11 matches
Mail list logo