On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:06:03AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vadim Lomovtsev
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:14:25 -0700
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> > index 5fc46c5a4f36..448d1fafc827 100644
> > --- a/drivers
From: Vadim Lomovtsev
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:14:25 -0700
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> index 5fc46c5a4f36..448d1fafc827 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nic.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/thund
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 06/04/18 12:14, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> > From: Vadim Lomovtsev
> >
> > It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
> > allocate array for them by overall number of mac addresses from netdev.
> >
>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:47:26AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
>
> On 04/06/2018 06:43 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> > Hi Gustavo,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:36:28AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > Hi Vadim,
> > >
> > > On 04/06/2018 06:14 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> > >
On 06/04/18 12:14, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
From: Vadim Lomovtsev
It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
allocate array for them by overall number of mac addresses from netdev.
This eventually removes multiple kmalloc() calls, aviod memory
fragmentation and allow to put
On 04/06/2018 06:43 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:36:28AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi Vadim,
On 04/06/2018 06:14 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
From: Vadim Lomovtsev
It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
allocate array for
Hi Gustavo,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:36:28AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
>
> On 04/06/2018 06:14 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
> > From: Vadim Lomovtsev
> >
> > It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
> > allocate array for them by overall number of mac
Hi Vadim,
On 04/06/2018 06:14 AM, Vadim Lomovtsev wrote:
From: Vadim Lomovtsev
It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
allocate array for them by overall number of mac addresses from netdev.
This eventually removes multiple kmalloc() calls, aviod memory
fragmentation a
From: Vadim Lomovtsev
It is too expensive to pass u64 values via linked list, instead
allocate array for them by overall number of mac addresses from netdev.
This eventually removes multiple kmalloc() calls, aviod memory
fragmentation and allow to put single null check on kmalloc
return value in
